drishva.ai

AI visibility for hospitality

Travellers have stopped searching. They've started asking.

When someone asks an AI model where to stay, it names three or four hotels. There is no page two. If your property is not in that answer, it was not ranked low — it was not considered. And nothing in your analytics will ever tell you it happened.

The shift

Hotel discovery moved somewhere you cannot see

Three numbers explain why this stopped being a future problem.

50%+of US travellers have now used AI to plan, book or navigate a trip. Generative platforms reached 33% for trip research, up fivefold since 2024. Phocuswright, The AI Surge, July 2026.
84%of AI citations come from earned media rather than a brand's own website. Your site is where someone lands after deciding to consider you. Muck Rack Generative Pulse, May 2026 — 25m+ citations analysed across ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini.
13%is the share of cited sources ChatGPT and Perplexity have in common. Just 3.8% appear on all four major engines, so visibility has to be measured engine by engine. Writesonic, May–June 2026 — 161,286 prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews.

What this looks like in practice

A real question, and a real answer

This is the shape of every conversation we have. Not a theory about AI — a question a guest would genuinely ask, and what four models actually returned.

Traveller asks Where should I stay in Edinburgh for a business trip — somewhere quiet, with a decent gym and late checkout?

The model answers with four hotels.

  1. A well-known city-centre property
  2. A boutique hotel with strong recent press coverage
  3. A chain property with a complete Google Business Profile
  4. An independent listed on the national tourism board

The fifth, sixth and seventh best-suited hotels in Edinburgh do not appear. There is no fifth position.

The difference is not quality. The four that appeared are cited in enough independent sources that a model can name them with confidence. That is a solvable problem — and it is the one we work on.

The measurement

Share of Model, measured properly

The percentage of relevant questions in which your property is actually named. Tracked per property, per engine, against a named competitive set, on a fixed query set, every month.

Share of Model is an emerging industry term and we did not coin it. Definitions vary and most are loose. Ours is published in full, including the query count, the engines, the competitive set, the source markets and the cadence — so you can audit the method before you buy it, and so a different firm measuring the same property should arrive at a comparable number.

You cannot manage what has never been counted. Most of the hospitality industry currently has no number at all — not a poor one, none. Share of Model is the instrument that was missing.

How we measure it →

None Most hotel groups have no figure at all for how often AI names them. Not a poor one — none. No standard hotel report produces it, so nothing flags its absence.

The framework

CITED

Five components. Almost every hour of delivery sits under one of them.

Crawlability

Whether AI systems can read your site at all. Some hotel sites block AI crawlers outright, usually by accident, through a content delivery network setting nobody chose deliberately. We publish the measured rate once our sample is large enough to be worth quoting; until then we will not put a figure on it.

Identity

Whether machines can resolve what your property is. Structured data, entity records, and consistency of name and address across every surface that carries them.

Trust

Whether independent sources confirm it. Reviews, tourism boards, guides and collections — the places a model treats as neutral.

Expression

Whether your content can be extracted. "Superbly located" is unusable. "Twelve minutes' walk from Waverley Station" can be quoted.

Distribution

Whether you exist in the places models look. Maps, directories, forums and tourism boards — much of it free, most of it unclaimed.

Applied per property

A forty-property group is forty entities in every system that matters. We work each one — not the group brand.

See the framework in detail →

What we never touch

Rates, availability, parity, commission structures or channel strategy. That is your revenue team's territory and it stays there. We publish our boundaries because very few firms in this category do.

Why a specialist

Hospitality is the whole firm

Not an agency with a few hotel clients. Every query library, every framework and every hour of delivery is hospitality.

That matters for a specific reason. A hotel group is not one brand — it is eight properties, or forty, or a hundred and twenty — each a separate entity with its own listings, reviews and local context. Optimising the group brand does very little for the one property in Manchester that is not appearing.

The work is also unusually shaped. Roughly 40% of it is per-property volume: listings, citations, entity records, tourism board registrations, review corpora. Multiply that across a portfolio of any size and it becomes work most agencies cannot price and quietly deprioritise.

More about how we work →

The register

Written for commercial teams

A commercial director does not want to hear about visibility. They want to know what this does to channel mix, and what it costs to acquire a direct booking against an OTA one.

Our reporting is one number, one page, monthly — built so it can be taken into a board meeting without translation.

Evidence

What the measurement revealed

Five questions. Four engines. What came back.

We will run five questions a guest would realistically ask about your market, across four AI models, and send you exactly what came back — with screenshots. No cost, no obligation, no meeting required.